@article {75,
	title = {Processes controlling ammonia emission from livestock slurry in the field},
	journal = {European Journal of Agronomy},
	volume = {19},
	year = {2003},
	pages = {465-486},
	abstract = {The processes of NH3 emission from field-applied slurry are reviewed and their relative importance assessed. In achieving this objective, the study served to focus on a number of features that have not previously been highlighted. These include the effect of the size of the area to which slurry is applied, the interaction between solar radiation input and wind speed, the role of the solid chemistry and the interaction between slurry NH4 and the slurry/soil cation exchange capacity (CEC). The most important processes controlling NH3 volatilisation were considered to be turbulent and molecular diffusion in the atmosphere, meteorological processes controlling evaporation and surface temperature, the ion production and buffering processes controlling the pH of the slurry/soil liquid, the solid chemistry that
determines precipitation of NH4  to slurry dry matter, the physical processes controlling the movement of slurry liquid into and within the soil, and the interaction of slurry liquid with soil CEC.},
	keywords = {EPNB},
	author = {Sommer, S. G and Genermont, S and Cellier, P and Hutchings, N. J and Olesen, J. E, Morvan, T}
}
@article {88,
	title = {GROSS NITROGEN BALANCES HANDBOOK},
	year = {2007},
	month = {10/2007},
	pages = {24},
	institution = {OECD, EUROSTAT},
	keywords = {agriculture, methodology, nitrogen, nutrient},
	url = {http://www.oecd.org/department/0,3355,en_2649_33793_1_1_1_1_1,00.html},
	author = {OECD}
}
@article {68,
	title = {Nutrient losses from manure management in the European Union},
	journal = {Lifestock Science},
	volume = {112},
	year = {2007},
	pages = {261-272},
	abstract = {Manure management systems are conducive to nutrient and carbon losses, but the magnitude of the loss highly depends on the
nutrient element, the manure management system and the environmental conditions. This paper discusses manure management
systems in the 27 Member States of the European Union (EU-27) and nutrient losses from these systems, with emphasis on
nitrogen (N). In general, losses decrease in the order: C, NNNSNK, Na, Cl, BNP, Ca, Mg, metals. Assessments made with the
integrated modeling tool MITERRA-EUROPE indicate that the total N excretion in 2000 by livestock in EU-27 was \~{}10,400 kton.
About 65\% of the total N excretion was collected in barns and stored for some time prior to application to agricultural land. Almost
30\% of the N excreted in barns was lost during storage; approximately 19\% via NH3 emissions, 7\% via emissions of NO, N2O and
N2, and 4\% via leaching and run-off. Differences between Member States in mean N losses from manure storages were large (range
19.5{\textendash}35\%). Another 19\% of the N excreted in animal housing systems was lost via NH3 emissions following the application of the
manure to land. The results indicate that maximally 52\% of the N excreted in barns was effectively recycled as plant nutrient.
Various emission abatement measures can be implemented and have been implemented already in some Member States to reduce
the emissions of NH3 and N2O, and the leaching of N and P. There is scope to reduce NH3 emissions by \~{}30\% relative to the
reference year 2000, although the uncertainty in estimated emissions and in the estimated effects of emission abatement measures is
relatively large.},
	keywords = {EPNB},
	author = {Oenema, O and Oudendag, D and Velthof, G. L}
}
@article {72,
	title = {Validation of model calculation of ammonia deposition in the neighbourhood of a poultry farm using measured NH3 concentrations and N deposition},
	journal = {Atmospheric Anvironment},
	volume = {43},
	year = {2008},
	abstract = {Substantial emission of ammonia (NH3) from animal houses and the related high local deposition of NH3- N are a threat to semi-natural nitrogen-deficient ecosystems situated near the NH3 source. In Denmark, there are regulations limiting the level of NH3 emission from livestock houses near N-deficient ecosystems that are likely to change due to nitrogen (N) enrichment caused by NH3 deposition. The models used for assessing NH3 emission from livestock production, therefore, need to be precise, as the regulation will affect both the nature of the ecosystem and the economy of the farmer. Therefore a study was carried out with the objective of validating the Danish model used to monitor NH3 transport, dispersion and deposition from and in the neighbourhood of a chicken farm. In the study we measured NH3 emission with standard flux measuring methods, NH3 concentrations at increasing distances from the chicken houses using passive diffusion samplers and deposition using 15N-enriched biomonitors and field plot studies. The dispersion and deposition of NH3 were modelled using the Danish OML-DEP
model. It was also shown that model calculations clearly reflect the measured NH3 concentration and N deposition. Deposition of N measured by biomonitors clearly reflected the variation in NH3 concentrations and showed that deposition was not significantly different from zero (P < 0.05) at distances greater
than 150{\textendash}200 m from these chicken houses. Calculations confirmed this, as calculated N deposition 320 m away from the chicken farm was only marginally affected by the NH3 emission from the farm. There was agreement between calculated and measured deposition showing that the model gives true estimates of the deposition in the neighbourhood of a livestock house emitting NH3},
	keywords = {EPNB},
	author = {Sommer, S. G and Ostergard, H. S and Lofstrom, P and Andersen, H. V and Jensen, L. S}
}
@inbook {Leip2011d,
	title = {{Integrating nitrogen fluxes at the European scale}},
	booktitle = {European Nitrogen Assessment},
	year = {2011},
	pages = {345{\textendash}376},
	publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
	organization = {Cambridge University Press},
	chapter = {16},
	address = {Cambridge, UK},
	keywords = {mypublications},
	url = {http://www.nine-esf.org/ENA-Book},
	author = {Leip, Adrian and Achermann, Beat and Billen, Gilles and Bleeker, Albert and Bouwman, Alexander F and De Vries, Wim and Dragosits, Ulli and D{\"o}ring, Ulrike and Fernall, Dave and Geupel, Markus and Heldstab, J{\"u}rg and Johnes, Penny and Le Gall, Anne Christine and Monni, Suvi and Neve{\v c}e{\v r}al, Rostislav and Orlandini, Lorenzo and Prud{\textquoteright}homme, Michel and Reuter, Hannes I and Simpson, David and Seufert, G{\"u}nther and Spranger, Till and Sutton, Mark A. and van Aardenne, John and Vo{\ss}, Maren and Winiwarter, Wilfried},
	editor = {Sutton, Mark and Howard, Clare and Erisman, Jan Willem and Billen, Gilles and Bleeker, Albert and van Grinsven, Hans and Grennfelt, Peringe and Grizzetti, Bruna}
}
@article {Sutton2011a,
	title = {{Too much of a good thing.}},
	journal = {Nature},
	volume = {472},
	number = {7342},
	year = {2011},
	month = {apr},
	pages = {159{\textendash}61},
	keywords = {agriculture, Agriculture: economics, Animals, Biodiversity, Climate Change, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Diet, Environmental Pollution, Environmental Pollution: adverse effects, Environmental Pollution: analysis, Environmental Pollution: economics, Environmental Pollution: statistics {\&} numerical da, Fertilizers, Fertilizers: analysis, Food Supply, Fossil Fuels, Humans, International Cooperation, Meat, Meat: utilization, nitrogen, Nitrogen Fixation, Nitrogen: adverse effects, Nitrogen: analysis, Nitrogen: economics, Nitrogen: metabolism, Reactive Nitrogen Species, Reactive Nitrogen Species: adverse effects, Reactive Nitrogen Species: analysis, Reactive Nitrogen Species: chemistry, Reactive Nitrogen Species: metabolism},
	issn = {1476-4687},
	doi = {10.1038/472159a},
	url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21478874},
	author = {Sutton, Mark A. and Oenema, Oene and Erisman, Jan Willem and Leip, Adrian and van Grinsven, Hans and Winiwarter, Wilfried}
}
@article {Westhoek2014,
	title = {{Food choices, health and environment: Effects of cutting Europe{\textquoteright}s meat and dairy intake}},
	journal = {Global Environmental Change},
	volume = {26},
	number = {1},
	year = {2014},
	month = {mar},
	pages = {196{\textendash}205},
	publisher = {Elsevier Ltd},
	abstract = {Western diets are characterised by a high intake of meat, dairy products and eggs, causing an intake of saturated fat and red meat in quantities that exceed dietary recommendations. The associated livestock production requires large areas of land and lead to high nitrogen and greenhouse gas emission levels. Although several studies have examined the potential impact of dietary changes on greenhouse gas emissions and land use, those on health, the agricultural system and other environmental aspects (such as nitrogen emissions) have only been studied to a limited extent. By using biophysical models and methods, we examined the large-scale consequences in the European Union of replacing 25-50{\%} of animal-derived foods with plant-based foods on a dietary energy basis, assuming corresponding changes in production. We tested the effects of these alternative diets and found that halving the consumption of meat, dairy products and eggs in the European Union would achieve a 40{\%} reduction in nitrogen emissions, 25-40{\%} reduction in greenhouse gas emissions and 23{\%} per capita less use of cropland for food production. In addition, the dietary changes would also lower health risks. The European Union would become a net exporter of cereals, while the use of soymeal would be reduced by 75{\%}. The nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) of the food system would increase from the current 18{\%} to between 41{\%} and 47{\%}, depending on choices made regarding land use. As agriculture is the major source of nitrogen pollution, this is expected to result in a significant improvement in both air and water quality in the EU. The resulting 40{\%} reduction in the intake of saturated fat would lead to a reduction in cardiovascular mortality. These diet-led changes in food production patterns would have a large economic impact on livestock farmers and associated supply-chain actors, such as the feed industry and meat-processing sector. {\textcopyright} 2014 The Authors.},
	keywords = {Dietary change, Greenhouse gas emissions, Human diet, Land use, Livestock, Reactive nitrogen},
	issn = {09593780},
	doi = {10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.02.004},
	url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.02.004 http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0959378014000338},
	author = {Westhoek, Henk and Lesschen, J.P. Jan Peter and Rood, Trudy and Wagner, Susanne and De Marco, Alessandra and Murphy-bokern, Donal and Leip, Adrian and van Grinsven, Hans and Sutton, Mark A. and Oenema, Oene}
}
@article {Leip2014b,
	title = {{Nitrogen-neutrality: a step towards sustainability}},
	journal = {Environmental Research Letters},
	volume = {9},
	number = {11},
	year = {2014},
	month = {nov},
	pages = {115001},
	publisher = {IOP Publishing},
	keywords = {Footprint, mypublications, nitrogen},
	issn = {1748-9326},
	doi = {10.1088/1748-9326/9/11/115001},
	url = {http://stacks.iop.org/1748-9326/9/i=11/a=115001?key=crossref.e00563c757c6f69d0f81a98a7c54fa9c},
	author = {Leip, Adrian and Leach, Allison M. and Musinguzi, Patrick and Tumwesigye, Trust and Olupot, Giregon and Stephen Tenywa, John and Mudiope, Joseph and Hutton, Olivia and Cordovil, Claudia M.d.S. and Bekunda, Mateete and Galloway, James N.}
}
@article {Ozbek2015,
	title = {{Estimating the gross nitrogen budget under soil nitrogen stock changes: A case study for Turkey}},
	journal = {Agriculture, Ecosystems {\&} Environment},
	volume = {205},
	year = {2015},
	month = {jul},
	pages = {48{\textendash}56},
	keywords = {agricultural production, budget, carbon, mypublications, nitrogen, soil},
	issn = {01678809},
	doi = {10.1016/j.agee.2015.03.008},
	url = {http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0167880915000924},
	author = {{\"O}zbek, Fethi {\c S}aban and Leip, Adrian}
}
@book {Westhoek2015,
	title = {{Nitrogen on the Table: The influence of food choices on nitrogen emissions and the European environment. (European Nitrogen Assessment Special Report on Nitrogen and Food.)}},
	number = {April},
	year = {2015},
	pages = {1{\textendash}5},
	publisher = {Centre for Ecology {\&} Hydrology},
	organization = {Centre for Ecology {\&} Hydrology},
	address = {Edinburgh, UK},
	isbn = {9781906698515},
	url = {https://www.clrtap-tfrn.org/sites/clrtap-tfrn.org/files/documents/Nitrogen_on_the_Table_Report_WEB.pdf},
	author = {Westhoek, Henk and Lesschen, J.P. Jan Peter and Leip, Adrian and Rood, Trudy and Wagner, Susanne and De Marco, A. and Murphy-bokern, Donal and Palli{\`e}re, C. and Howard, Clare M and Oenema, Oene and Sutton, Mark A. and Marco, De}
}
@article {Uwizeye2020,
	title = {{Nitrogen emissions along global livestock supply chains}},
	journal = {Nature Food},
	year = {2020},
	month = {jul},
	issn = {2662-1355},
	doi = {10.1038/s43016-020-0113-y},
	url = {http://www.nature.com/articles/s43016-020-0113-y https://github.com/uaimable/Global{\_}Nitrogen{\_}assessment},
	author = {Uwizeye, Aimable and de Boer, Imke J. M. and Opio, Carolyn I and Schulte, Rogier P O and Falcucci, Alessandra and Tempio, Giuseppe and Teillard, F{\'e}lix and Casu, Flavia and Rulli, Monica and Galloway, James N and Leip, Adrian and Erisman, Jan Willem and Robinson, Timothy P and Steinfeld, Henning and Gerber, Pierre J}
}
@article {Kanter2019,
	title = {{Nitrogen pollution policy beyond the farm}},
	journal = {Nature Food},
	volume = {1},
	number = {1},
	year = {2020},
	month = {jan},
	pages = {27{\textendash}32},
	abstract = {Nitrogen is a crucial input to food production and yet its oversupply in many parts of the world contributes to a number of environmental problems. Most policies dedicated to reducing agricultural nitrogen pollution focus on changing farmer behaviour. However, farm-level policies are challenging to implement and farmers are just one of several actors in the agri-food chain. The activities of other actors {\textemdash} from fertilizer manufacturers to wastewater treatment companies {\textemdash} can also impact nitrogen losses at the farm level and beyond. Consequently, policymakers have a broader range of policy options than traditionally thought to address nitrogen pollution from field to fork. Inspired by the concept of full-chain nitrogen use efficiency, this Perspective introduces the major actors common in agri-food chains from a nitrogen standpoint, identifies nitrogen policies that could be targeted towards them and proposes several new criteria to guide ex-ante analysis of the feasibility and design of different policy interventions. Sustainably feeding ten billion people by 2050 will require fundamental changes in the global food system {\textemdash} a broad portfolio of policy options and a framework for how to select them is essential.},
	issn = {2662-1355},
	doi = {10.1038/s43016-019-0001-5},
	url = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-019-0001-5 http://www.nature.com/articles/s43016-019-0001-5},
	author = {Kanter, David R and Bartolini, Fabio and Kugelberg, Susanna and Leip, Adrian and Oenema, Oene and Uwizeye, Aimable}
}
@article {Carlo,
	title = {{Sustainable food protein supply reconciling human and ecosystem health: A Leibniz Position}},
	journal = {Global Food Security},
	volume = {25},
	year = {2020},
	month = {jun},
	pages = {100367},
	keywords = {corresponding author, s},
	issn = {22119124},
	doi = {10.1016/j.gfs.2020.100367},
	url = {https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2211912420300201},
	author = {Weindl, Isabelle and Ost, Mario and Wiedmer, Petra and Schreiner, Monika and Neugart, Susanne and Klopsch, Rebecca and K{\"u}hnhold, Holger and Kloas, Werner and Henkel, Ina M. and Schl{\"u}ter, Oliver and Bu{\ss}ler, Sara and Bellingrath-Kimura, Sonoko D. and Ma, Hua and Grune, Tilman and Rolinski, Susanne and Klaus, Susanne}
}
